Egg Donor Faces Discrimination Over Sexuality

Download IPFS

A young Australian woman’s decision to donate eggs altruistically has brought attention to concerns about equitable treatment within fertility clinics. Alana, a 28-year-old Melbourne resident, reported that questions about her bisexuality emerged during the screening process, raising questions about how sexual orientation factors into donor eligibility.

According to Alana, several clinics asked detailed questions regarding her relationship history and sexual practices. One clinic staff member reportedly expressed concerns that “certain lifestyles present higher risks,” a statement that conflicts with existing medical evidence showing no impact of sexual orientation on egg viability or donor suitability. Fertility specialists note that while national guidelines provide general frameworks, individual clinics retain discretion in setting some donor eligibility criteria, which may lead to inconsistencies in practice.

Professor John Eden, medical director at Sydney IVF, stated, “There is currently no uniform regulatory oversight regarding donor screening across Australian fertility clinics, resulting in varied policies and potential for unintended bias.”

The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) provides guidelines for assisted reproductive technologies that include principles to prevent discrimination, including on the basis of sexual orientation. However, enforcement mechanisms are limited, and oversight largely depends on individual clinics and state regulations.

Shadow Health Minister Anne Ruston commented on the issue, calling for clearer national standards to ensure fair treatment of donors regardless of sexual identity. Data from the Fertility Society of Australia (FSA) indicates that around 60 percent of fertility clinics have formal anti-discrimination policies, with clinics in regional areas less likely to have such policies compared to metropolitan providers.

The fertility sector faces increasing demand for donor eggs, and concerns about equitable access are growing. Alana’s experience has reignited public discussion about the balance between clinic autonomy and patient rights, with some advocates calling for legislative reform to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexuality in fertility treatments.

As the conversation continues, stakeholders emphasize the importance of maintaining medical rigor while ensuring inclusive practices that reflect Australia’s diverse population. The Fertility Society of Australia continues to work with clinics and regulators to improve transparency and fairness in donor recruitment and screening processes.