Australia’s F-35 Parts Supply to Israel Raises Concerns

Recent reports revealing Australia’s supply of F-35 Joint Strike Fighter parts to Israel have sparked debate over the nation’s role in the Middle East conflict, as these components are linked to Israel’s military operations in Gaza. This article examines Australia’s involvement, the strategic implications, and calls for transparency in defence exports, emphasizing national security priorities.

Australia, a key player in the global F-35 program led by Lockheed Martin, contributes critical components through over 70 companies, including Rosebank Engineering in Melbourne, which produces the sole-source uplock actuator system for the jet’s bomb bay doors. Declassified Australia’s July 2025 investigation uncovered shipping records showing direct exports of aircraft parts from Sydney to Tel Aviv, despite government claims of no direct arms transfers to Israel. These parts support Israel’s F-35 fleet, used in Gaza airstrikes, raising questions about compliance with the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which Australia ratified in 2014 and prohibits arms transfers linked to war crimes or genocide.

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) and government officials maintain that exports are part of a global supply chain, primarily to the United States, not directly to Israel. However, critics argue this indirect supply chain implicates Australia in Israel’s actions, which Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have labeled as potential genocide, citing over 58,000 Palestinian deaths. Mohamed Duar, Amnesty’s spokesperson, stated, “The lack of transparency undermines Australia’s obligations under international law,” urging a two-way arms embargo. Protests at companies like Heat Treatment Australia (HTA) in Melbourne reflect public unease, with activists disrupting operations to demand accountability.

While the current Labor government faces scrutiny for opaque export controls, the focus remains on Australia’s strategic interests. The F-35 program, valued at $4.13 billion for Australian firms, strengthens defence ties with allies like the US and United Kingdom, critical for Indo-Pacific security. Withdrawing could weaken these partnerships and harm Australia’s defence industry. Yet, the government must address public and legal pressure for clarity on export end-uses to align with international obligations, ensuring national security without compromising ethical standards.